2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2001 Rover 45

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 45 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 440 more horse power than 2001 Rover 45. (102 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 45.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 45. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 45.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS-V 2001 Rover 45
Make Cadillac Rover
Model CTS-V 45
Year Released 2009 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6162 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 542 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 550 Nm 128 Nm
Torque RPM 6200 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 54 L