2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2002 Peugeot H2O
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot H2O. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot H2O would be higher.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot H2O, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 2002 Peugeot H2O | |
Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
Model | CTS-V | H2O |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |