2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2003 Lincoln Blackwood
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lincoln Blackwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lincoln Blackwood would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Lincoln Blackwood is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln Blackwood will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Lincoln Blackwood has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lincoln Blackwood will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 2003 Lincoln Blackwood | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | CTS-V | Blackwood |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3530 mm |