2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2003 Mahindra Commander
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mahindra Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mahindra Commander would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 480 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Commander.
Because 2003 Mahindra Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 2003 Mahindra Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
Model | CTS-V | Commander |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 2110 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2690 mm |