2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 357 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | CTS-V | XL7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |