2009 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 424 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (175 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS-V | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | CTS-V | KB |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |