2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1946 Rover P2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Rover P2 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1946 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 368 kg more than 1946 Rover P2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1946 Rover P2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | CTS | P2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1577 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1420 kg |