2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1947 Talbot T 26

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1947 Talbot T 26. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 38 kg more than 1947 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1947 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1947 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: