2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Ford F
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Ford F would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1948 Ford F | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | F |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1948 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |
