2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1948 Maserati A6GCS | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | A6GCS |
Year Released | 2009 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2320 mm |