2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Simca 8
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 8 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1948 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 870 kg more than 1948 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1948 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Simca |
| Model | CTS | 8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 1090 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |
