2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1950 Maserati 4CLT
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati 4CLT has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati 4CLT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1950 Maserati 4CLT | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | 4CLT |
Year Released | 2009 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2510 mm |