2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 310 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2940 mm |
