2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1954 DKW F 89
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 880 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1954 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | CTS | F 89 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 682 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |