2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1954 Triumph 10 Break
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1954 Triumph 10 Break | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | 10 Break |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 760 kg |