2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1955 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 738 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1955 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | CTS | A6G |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |
