2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Jensen Interceptor
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 3,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1956 Jensen Interceptor. (129 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Jensen Interceptor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 293 kg more than 1956 Jensen Interceptor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jensen Interceptor (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1956 Jensen Interceptor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1956 Jensen Interceptor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jensen |
| Model | CTS | Interceptor |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 3991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 287 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 87.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2860 mm |
