2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Maserati 300
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1956 Maserati 300. (242 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1956 Maserati 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1956 Maserati 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | CTS | 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 307 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2320 mm |
