2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Maserati 300

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1956 Maserati 300. (242 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 882 kg more than 1956 Maserati 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Maserati 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1956 Maserati 300 has manual transmission. 1956 Maserati 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: