2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 428 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | Master RR |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |