2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D weights approximately 295 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1957 Mercedes-Benz 300D | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | CTS | 300D |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |
