2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1961 Ferrari 156
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1961 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1328 kg more than 1961 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1961 Ferrari 156 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
| Model | CTS | 156 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 307 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2330 mm |
