2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1962 DAF 600
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1962 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | CTS | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 65 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 28 L |
