2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (111 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Isuzu Bellett | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | CTS | Bellett |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1469 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 66 HP |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
