2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Riley Elf
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley Elf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley Elf would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1963 Riley Elf. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley Elf.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Riley Elf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley Elf. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley Elf.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Riley Elf | |
| Make | Cadillac | Riley |
| Model | CTS | Elf |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 847 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
