2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1964 Citroen DS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen DS. (144 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1964 Citroen DS | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | DS |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 85.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |