2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 630 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | CTS | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |