2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1965 Jensen Interceptor
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 4,473 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1965 Jensen Interceptor. (238 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1965 Jensen Interceptor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 365 kg more than 1965 Jensen Interceptor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1965 Jensen Interceptor | |
Make | Cadillac | Jensen |
Model | CTS | Interceptor |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 4473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2600 mm |