2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 705 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | CTS | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |
