2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1965 NSU 1000

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1965 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1000. (71 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1000. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1965 NSU 1000 has manual transmission. 1965 NSU 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 1965 NSU 1000
Make Cadillac NSU
Model CTS 1000
Year Released 2009 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 304 HP 43 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 370 Nm 71 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 650 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3800 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 37 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]