2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1966 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 377 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1966 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | CTS | 2CV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5664 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 395 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
