2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1966 Steyr 700C

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1966 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1966 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr 700C.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 1966 Steyr 700C
Make Cadillac Steyr
Model CTS 700C
Year Released 2009 1966
Engine Size 3599 cc 643 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 263 HP 20 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 343 Nm 40 Nm
Torque RPM 3100 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 540 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3190 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1330 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 1950 mm