2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Innocenti C
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Innocenti C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Innocenti C would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1967 Innocenti C. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Innocenti C.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Innocenti C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Innocenti C. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Innocenti C.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Innocenti C | |
Make | Cadillac | Innocenti |
Model | CTS | C |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 253 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |