2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP) has 182 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 340 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | CTS | Bellel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |