2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Saab Sonett
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Saab Sonett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Saab Sonett would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1967 Saab Sonett. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Saab Sonett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1967 Saab Sonett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Saab Sonett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Saab Sonett. (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Saab Sonett.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Saab Sonett | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | CTS | Sonett |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 58.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |