2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1968 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 635 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1968 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | CTS | Munga |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5664 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 395 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 31 L |
