2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1968 Plymouth VIP

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Plymouth VIP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Plymouth VIP would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Plymouth VIP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Plymouth VIP (230 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Plymouth VIP should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 141 kg more than 1968 Plymouth VIP.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Plymouth VIP (461 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1968 Plymouth VIP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS. 1968 Plymouth VIP has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Plymouth VIP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 1968 Plymouth VIP
Make Cadillac Plymouth
Model CTS VIP
Year Released 2009 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 5208 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 179 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 232 Nm 461 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.3 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 84.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.2:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1788 kg 1647 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5420 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3030 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 90 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]