2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1974 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1974 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | CTS | 929 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
