2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1974 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | CTS | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 37 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |