2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1975 Mazda 818
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 818.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1975 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 818 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |