2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Saab 900
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Saab 900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Saab 900 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1979 Saab 900. (143 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1979 Saab 900.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Saab 900, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Saab 900. (236 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Saab 900.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1979 Saab 900 | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | CTS | 900 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |