2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Simca 1309
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Simca 1309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Simca 1309 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1980 Simca 1309. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Simca 1309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 635 kg more than 1980 Simca 1309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Simca 1309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Simca 1309. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Simca 1309.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Simca 1309 | |
Make | Cadillac | Simca |
Model | CTS | 1309 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 80.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |