2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 966 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | CTS | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |