2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1981 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 738 kg more than 1981 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | CTS | XJR |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |