2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Lancia A 112
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 980 kg more than 1981 Lancia A 112.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Lancia A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1981 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Lancia A 112 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | CTS | A 112 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2040 mm |