2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Seat 127
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 127 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1981 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 127.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Seat 127 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | CTS | 127 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 259 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
