2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | CTS | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 259 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |