2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Lancia Beta

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Beta. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Beta.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Beta.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 1982 Lancia Beta
Make Cadillac Lancia
Model CTS Beta
Year Released 2009 1982
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3564 cc 1367 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 259 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 253 Nm 108 Nm
Torque RPM 3100 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 71.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 8.9:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors