2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Donkervoort S7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac CTS | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Donkervoort |
| Model | CTS | S7 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1080 mm |
