2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 968 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | 9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |